VIOLATION! VIOLATION!

If you are not paying the "cuci kereta" boys to wash your vehicle but the vehicle next to you is and if you start to find dents and scratches on your car - it may have been as a result of the boys knocking, scraping into your car while they are cleaning your neighbor's car! READ ABOUT IT HERE

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Peaceful protest over development

The Star (Monday)

PETALING JAYA residents ended the year with a strong message that they intend to be heard.

About 200 residents from the area turned up in front of the FAS field in Kelana Jaya to stage a peaceful protest against the development of a commercial hub consisting of:

·20 units of 6½ storey shoplots

·72 units of 4½ storey shoplots

·two 15 to 28 storey office blocks with 8 levels of podium

·1 basement car park, and

·four electricity sub-stations.

The protest was organised by the All Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Residents’ Association Coalition (APAC).

Among some of the banners held by residents read “PJ is Overdeveloped” and “Dear developer, we fully support similar development if it is behind/in front/beside YOUR house.”

Taman Mayang Rukun Tetangga chairman Chan Chow Wang said that the jam along the LDP was unbearable and other developments in the area such as the Paradigm was already underway.

“We can’t even get in and out of Taman Mayang from the LDP. When we try to make a U-turn into our area, a stretch of about 500m would take us at least half and hour. To make matters worse, many people are parking along the LDP in front of the Kelana Jaya LRT station,” said Chan.

Chan said that the land was given to FAS to be used as a football field and it was unthinkable to convert the land for commercial use.

APAC chairman Liew Wei Beng said that they would submit an official objection to the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ).

“We want this open area to be maintained. The development of this commercial hub will lead to further congestion along the LDP and increase traffic at the tunnel leading into Ara Damansara,” said Liew.

He added that the APAC would also raise the issue of land conversion from institutional to commercial without due process and consultation.

“The first development order was approved in 2006. As far as we know, none of the residents have been consulted before the MBPJ issued the development order then,” said Liew.

Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua said that the residents have spoken loud and clear and steps should be taken to retain as many open spaces as possible.

“There is enough congestion and there should be no development until the traffic problem is solved,” said Pua, who agreed that consultation with residents should have been carried out when converting the land for commercial use.

MBPJ councillor Cynthi Gabriel said that the turnout for the protest was encouraging but that residents still need to submit official objections to the council.

Councillor Mak Khuin Weng said that he was concerned about the discrepancies brought up by residents and would bring up the issue with the MBPJ town planning department.

Many residents in the surrounding area were also upset that only a handful received letters from the MBPJ regarding the development.

One resident also claimed that the MBPJ was misleading the people as the objection board put up at the site of the development had no mention of the two blocks of 15- to 28-storey office buildings but it was mentioned in the letters which not many residents received.

Also present was Bukit Gasing assemblyman Edward Lee.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

D'Aman Crimson Owners Forum

I was Googling for some info about our immediate 'neighbors' and came across a rather active blog for D'Aman Crimson Owners.

Similar problems like break-ins .... please read the comments.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

KDP Condo House Rules


I seldom read what is posted on the notice boards (at cafeteria or at each block) but I noticed an advertisement to "learn how to swim". Although the venue for the lessons was not mentioned I won't be surprised if it was at our swimming pool.

I dug up my copy of House Rules and found this;

Page 4 under 2.11 Solicitation

No solicitation of goods and services, religious or political activities shall be permitted in the premises.

Page 13 under 9.2.15 No Swimming Lessons

Swimming lessons are prohibited in the pool.

I know someone IS giving swimming lessons IN the pool and I am sure it has been going on for a few years now. Personally I don't quite understand why lessons cannot be conducted in the pool but I think it is in the book for a reason. So by having lessons and putting up the ad, TWO rules are broken.

Another issue I can state would be the presence of the "cuci kereta" (car wash boys). Is this not solicitation? Let us not go into the usage of water but RULE 2.11 is clear. Besides if you prohibit this car wash business I am sure our water usage will be reduced as I bet most of the patrons would be too lazy to wash their own vehicles. These guys have been operating for so many years too!

From a security standpoint the fact that two fellas are "roaming" freely at late hours in our compound sounds ludicrous. I mean how do you you if they are not informants to burglars. And I am sure while they are washing cars they are sure to knock into the car next to it. These little dents are a price to pay for us non-customers?

To cut to the chase, IT IS A VIOLATION TO ALLOW THIS UNAUTHORIZED BUSINESS IN OUR CONDO. Next a resident may well set up a stall at the lift to sell nasi lemak!!!

KELANA D'PUTERA CONDO